Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

The Uk Territorial Constitution Notes

Law Notes > Public Law Notes

This is an extract of our The Uk Territorial Constitution document, which we sell as part of our Public Law Notes collection written by the top tier of University College London students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Public Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

The UK Territorial Constitution
UK= multipolar system with a plurality of parliaments/ assemblies:Westminster Parliament
Edinburgh Parliament
Cardiff Assembly
Belfast Assembly.

The territorial constitutional arrangements are still/ constantly evolving. There are many issues i.e.
Division of powers
Constitutional
Fiscal responsibilities
Multiple identities e.t.c.
The Brexit process is of particular relevance, not least since England and Wales voted 'leave' and Northern Ireland and Scotland voted 'remain'...
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Unitary State and Union State

`The unitary state [is] built up around one unambiguous political centre which enjoys economic dominance and pursues a more or less undeviating policy of administrative standardisation. All areas of the state are treated alike, and all institutions are directly under the control of the centre.'
[strong version]
'The union state [is] not the result of straightforward dynastic union, for example by treaty, marriage or inheritance. Integration is less than perfect. While administrative standardisation prevails over most of the territory, the consequences of personal union entail survival of pre-union rights and institutional infrastructures which preserve some degree of regional autonomy…'

Note the fact of Dicey's doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty as an English (and not Scots) doctrine…
Devolution and Federalism

Devolution: The transfer of powers at present exercised by ministers and parliament to regional or sub-national bodies which are subordinate…
Devolution is thus a process by which parliament transfers its powers without relinquishing its supremacy, at least in legal theory.

Federalism: as classically defined, a system where the sub-national territorial units of government are within their defined spheres of powers and functions supreme, in the sense that neither the central government nor other sub-national units can override their exercise of legislative and other power. But under the broader rubric of 'the Federal idea' of 'enabling unity while guaranteeing diversity' there is lots of room for hybrids in terms of 'self rule' and 'shared rule'.
Note the view of the UK as moving in a 'quasi-federal' direction….
Forms of devolution
● Legislative - powers transferred to the regions/provinces/countries to determine policy on a range of subjects, to enact legislation to give effect to that policy and to provide the administrative machinery for its execution, while reserving to the central (Union) legislature the ultimate power to legislate for the regions on all matters.

Reserved powers model: governing statute sets out powers retained at the centre and devolves everything else.
Conferred powers model: governing statute sets out devolved powers (in other words, what is not specified is not devolved).

● Executive - Central (Union) legislature and central government …
responsible for the framework of legislation and major policy on all matters but … wherever possible, transfer to other directly elected assemblies the responsibility within the framework for devising specific policies for the regions, including through delegated legislation, for the execution of those policies and for general administration.
● Administrative (decentralisation) - decision-making in territorial departments (old-style Scottish Office etc) and agencies.
Systems of devolution

Asymmetrical Devolution: different measures of devolution within the
State for different regions/provinces/countries [the original UK model].

Devolution 'all round': whereby all parts of the state are granted substantially similar devolved powers. In a strong version, 'Home Rule' all round.

DEEPER CONTESTATION
Competing interpretations of what the United Kingdom actually is:

a unitary nation-state: based on social and political homogeneity. This in turn draws on modernization theories based on territorial integration and globalisation. This is matched on the constitutional side by the
'Westminster' understanding of the UK as a unitary state founded on parliamentary sovereignty.
a plurinational union: 'family of nations' based on contractual membership, territorial differentiation and negotiation and ultimately,
based on the recognition of popular sovereignty in each part of the UK,
self-determination of its constituent parts. This view is expressed for example by the notably pro-devolution and pro-union Welsh Government. In this regard, there may be disagreement about the demos, or the existence of a unitary people; telos, or the purpose of union; and ethos, the existence or need for shared a values across the polity.


Unitary States: All of the constitutional power is allocated to the centre who may then devolve power to the regions. The UK is normally regarded as a unitary state but this is not definite. There is no need for a written constitution, strong judicial review, or a second chamber of national legislature for the regions. The centre could if it wished take the power back from the regions.
The UK is a unitary state but this is more of a spectrum. The UK is moving towards a more federal state. Because in reality it is impossible to see power withdrawn from the devolution settlements.
If the UK became a full federal state there would be a need for a written constitution, the judges to exercise judicial review and a reform of the House of
Lords which represent the regions (proposition of Ed Miliband).
Constitutional changes initiated by New LabourThe Human Rights Act incorporated the European Convention on Human
Rights into UK law.
A Supreme Court was established, with a constitutional remit.
Devolved legislatures were established for Scotland, Wales and Northern
Ireland.

Yet, while the programme may have attracted a broad coalition of support, that did not depend of fundamental agreement on the end point or telos. The approach = an incomplete one, leaving many issues in abeyance.
Could say:
- It was a radical programme of reform, which might have put the country on the road to a fully-fledged and federal constitution.
- Or: It might be seen as a conservative series of measures, another step in central territorial management which left the central doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty intact.
- Another view, prevalent for over a hundred years, was that home rule or devolution would lead to the break-up of the state.
A central question when addressing the UK territorial constitution is whether this general development is, or can be, the basis of a stable equilibrium or whether it will be overwhelmed by either centrifugal or centripetal (centralising) tendencies.
Not least, that is, when the extended Brexit process is added to the mix…
BASIS OF THE UNION

UK has come together because there are benefits in working together.
This is a union based on consent.

Not true: Northern Ireland and Scotland were merged by choice but not Wales.
This has affected the way in which regions of the UK perceive themselves. This is one explanation of the vibrancy in Scotland and the re-emergence of nationalism in Wales. They are recognized as constituent assemblies that are constitutional agents. Continuation of the Union depends on continued consent and regions can withdraw from the UK if they wish.
Note in particular that Scotland and Northern Ireland always retained separate legal systems (unlike Wales which was integrated into the English legal system).
More particularly:

The Act of Union between Scotland and England of 1707 provided that the
UK Parliament it established could not take certain actions such as abolishing the Scottish Courts or disestablishing the Presbyterian religion.
Whether these provisions provided substantive and enforceable limits on the powers of the UK Parliament was not certain at least in Scotland in the light of a distinctive Scots tradition of popular sovereignty (MacCormick v
Lord Advocate SC 396 Court of Session, (1953)).
Administrative decentralisation: from 1885 there has been a Secretary of
State for Scotland, from 1964 a Secretary of State for Wales.

MacCormick v Lord Advocate - MacCormick challenged the Queen's title. Is
Queen Elizabeth's title the second or just Queen Elizabeth? There was Queen
Elizabeth first of England but not of Scotland. So in Scottish law she was just
Queen Elizabeth.
The principle of unlimited sovereignty of Parliament is a distinctively an English principle that has no counterpart in Scottish constitutional law. Parliamentary sovereignty is just a rule of the English legal system. The Scottish legal system and the English legal system merged created the UK Parliament. There are different rules that define this new institution. Since Scottish Parliamentary sovereignty did not exist, this could constrain the UK Parliament.
A substantial 'pre-history' of devolution

Northern Ireland 1920-1972
-Supremacy of Westminster shown by the fact that the Northern
Ireland Parliament was prorogued without its consent in 1972.

Gradual rise of demand for separate institutions from 1960s onwards
(particular demands of national identity, regionalism in Europe)
Kilbrandon Commission (1973) on the Constitution.
Rejected federalism on grounds that the difference in size amongst the units (England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland) made it impractical, not least since it risked gridlock (an English Parliament rivalling Westminster).

Failed attempt in 1978 to provide legislative devolution to Scotland and executive devolution to Wales.
Proposals struggled through Westminster Parliament which imposed a requirement that the measures be approved by referendum with at least 40% of the electorate in favour. There was narrow referendum approval in Scotland,(52% voting in favour but representing only 33% of the electorate) big rejection in
Wales).
'West Lothian Question'

Political divergence between UK Conservative majority in 1980s and 1990s and Labour majorities in Scotland and Wales fuelled desire for devolution.
1989 Scottish Constitutional Convention (Labour, Liberal Democrats and civil society) set out a "Claim of Right" demanding devolution.
'Quango-land' in Wales

Enter New Labour:
1997 Devolution referendums: Scotland 74% yes (and also a majority for tax-raising powers); Wales 50.3% yes
Scotland Act 1998, Government of Wales Act 1998
Good Friday (Belfast) Agreement 1998 1998 referendums (Northern Ireland 71% yes to terms of the
Agreement; Republic of Ireland 94% yes to relevant Irish constitutional amendments)
Northern Ireland Act 1998

Power should be regionalized because of certain reasons:


National self determination: people prefer and need to govern themselves. Power should track national boundaries. National groups believe shared history creates a special connection but this is not always effective. David Miller (national liberalism) states there is value in tying political power to national groups because they act like a large family and value the connection that they do not have a connection to those outside.
This commonality in interest provides a functioning system of government.
Democracy can only function within this national state because of the sacrifices the groups make will allow functional government. Even if the national stories are implausible, there is a benefit to tying constitutional power to national groups because nationals will treat each other better.


Subsidiarity: (supported by Barber) in a democracy, decisions should be made by those affected by them. When issues affect certain people, those decisions should be passed off to those affected. This can lead to better government since people affected make the decision and have most information and incentive when making the decision and best interest. It does not matter where the boundaries of national groups are,
what matters is the impact of national groups.
Problems with subsidiarity: It is very difficult to draw boundaries. Different political issues have different boundaries. If there is a separate constitutional entity for every issue, there would be an infinite number of constitutional statutes.
There were strong arguments against regionalisation of power in British history,
even though now everyone is a supporter of it.
Regardless, New Labour had pressure to move for a system of devolution. In 1998 the Labour party pushed through radical reforms. There were devolution referendums in which all three nations voted yes (Scotland and N. Ireland radically since their identities were kept and for Ireland it was also seen as a peace treaty, Wales with a very little margin). The very little margin in Wales led to very little devolutionary power given to them. Welsh constitutional identity had been limited as a result of assimilation. By virtue of population division
Wales does not have a central national identity. Scotland in comparison is much more diluted in the centre which helped them retain a certain national identity.
Devolution is preferred over federal settlement since it was reconcilable with
Parliamentary sovereignty. Parliament could end devolution settlements and retake the power. Incrementalism is the lack of certainty of devolution since it wasn't certain how devolution would develop. There is continuation in devolution
SCOTLAND
Original model (2000-2012)
Legislative devolution - reserved powers model
Reserved matters are matters such as foreign affairs,
finance, defence, immigration and nationality). Acts beyond the powers of the (Scottish) Parliament are void (s. 29(1)).
The Supreme Court of the UK has final power of decision on whether a matter falls within the competence of the Scottish
Parliament.
Additional member electoral system (d'Hondt). Designed to avoid overall majorities. But note that in 2011 the Scottish Nationalist Party
(SNP) won a majority of the seats.
Very limited tax raising powers, with finance coming in the form of a block grant from the UK Treasury (see below). Position subsequently changed to limited extent by 2012 Scotland Act (see below).


Scotland Act 1998, s. 29 - legislative competence
(1) An Act of the Scottish Parliament is not law so far as any provision of the Act is outside the legislative competence of the Parliament.
Expansion - Scotland Act 2012

More fiscal responsibility

UK Treasury to leave it to the Scottish Parliament to decide how to raise the difference in Scotland-only taxes. To be accompanied by a corresponding cut in the block grant.

Independence referendum
Scottish Government mandate- Note the 'co-operation clause': 'The two governments are committed to continue to work together constructively in the light of the outcome, whatever it is, in the best interests of the people of
Scotland and of the rest of the United Kingdom.'
Transfer of functions order.
The referendum question was: "Should Scotland be an independent country?"
and voters were asked to choose yes or no.
The result of the Scottish referendum held in September 2014 was:

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Public Law Notes.