R v Latimer [1886] 17 QBD 359
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:03
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case R v Latimer
Table Of Contents
A prisoner tried to hit another, but actually hit woman beside him.
He was convicted and his appeal dismissed.
Lord Coleridge
Says that a malicious act carried out against a person, which in fact injures a third party, is considered guilty.
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on R v Latimer
1,072 total pages
667 purchased
Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
80 total pages
10 purchased
In depth notes with lecturer and textbook comments included as well as ...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Criminal Law | Mens Rea — Intention Recklessness And Negligence Notes (24 pages) |
| Criminal law | Offences Against The Person Notes Real Notes (28 pages) |
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
1,072 total pages
667 purchased
Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.