Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our privacy policy.

Technical settings

Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Alphacell v Wodward

[1972] AC 824

Case summary last updated at 15/01/2020 07:56 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Alphacell v Wodward

Alphacell is a manufacturer whose pollution pumps were not working and this allowed pollution to enter the nearby river. They were convicted and their appeal was rejected. HL rejected their appeal since “causing polluting matter to enter the river” was a strict liability offence. Causing had a common sense meaning and no state of mind was required to be guilty. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Criminal Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Criminal Law Notes

Criminal Law Notes >>