Beatty v Gillbanks [1892] 9 QBD 308
Judgement for the case Beatty v Gillbanks
Table Of Contents
There was an order binding over the leaders of the Salvation army to prevent them parading through the town for fear that it was very likely that a rival group would attack them as in previous instances.
-
The divisional court argued that since the Salvation Army’s march was lawful and did not attempt to cause any violence.
Therefore to stop them marching would be to punish a person doing a lawful act on the grounds that it would lead to another doing an unlawful act.
Therefore the order was quashed.
RELATED CASES
For Further Study on Beatty v Gillbanks
A collection of the best BCL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an O...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Criminal Justice, Security, & Human Rights | Fair Trial Rights And Secret Evidence Notes (117 pages) |
| Criminal Justice, Security, & Human Rights | Positive Obligations Notes (59 pages) |
Constitutional Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.