This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

BMW Nederland BV v Deenik [1999] C-63/97

Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 04/01/2024 07:13
  • Claimant sued Defendant, a car dealer, who described himself as being a specialist in repair and maintenance of BMWs.

  • Claimant claimed that this was unlawful use of their trade mark.

Held

  • Defendant could rely on defence of use to indicate intended purpose.

  • This because use of mark was necessary for Claimant to communicate to public what sort of work he did.

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
  • 'Oxbridge Notes' prizewinning note marketplace has been serving students since 2010 with premium study materials
  • Reap the benefits of joined-up learning and earn higher grades, just like our 75,000+ happy customers.
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.