Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our privacy policy.

Technical settings

Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Adam Opel v Autec

[2007] Case C-48/05

Case summary last updated at 01/02/2020 19:35 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Adam Opel v Autec

C, car manufacturer, had trade mark for its logo for cars and toys. D sold remote-controlled scale-models of one of C’s cars, with C’s trade mark on them. C sued for infringement under Article5(1)(a). Held:
 
·       Is no infringement where average consumer does not believe goods come from owner or economically-linked undertaking.
·       Thus if German consumers do not see D’s use of C’s mark as indicating origin of scale-models, no infringement.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Intellectual Property Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Intellectual Property Law Notes

Intellectual Property Law Notes >>