Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Datacard Corporation v Eagle Technologies Ltd

[2011] EWHC 244

Case summary last updated at 01/02/2020 16:24 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Datacard Corporation v Eagle Technologies Ltd

C (Datacard) was supplier of printers; owned trade mark ‘DATACARD’. D (Eagle Technologies) was seller of card printers. D used C’s trade mark on its website, and also on labels applied to packaging of printer products sold by D. C sued for infringement of trade mark. Held:
 
·       Was infringement under Article 5(1)(b)
·       On basis of ECJ authority, post-sale confusion suffices to show infringement.
·       Even if consumer is not confused about origin when purchasing goods on website, may be confused later upon delivery of products
Ø  i.e. consumer might not, when buying printer, have any belief at all that that printer is connected to Datacard
Ø  but when printer then arrives with ‘DATACARD’ on product label, consumer may only at that point form incorrect belief they are connected to Datacard
 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Intellectual Property Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Intellectual Property Law Notes

Intellectual Property Law Notes >>