Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our privacy policy.

Technical settings

Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Holterhoff v Freiesleben

[2002] ECRI-4187

Case summary last updated at 01/02/2020 19:39 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Holterhoff v Freiesleben

C owned trade mark ‘SPIRIT SUN’ for precious stones. D, a jeweller, promised customers he could cut a diamond in the shape of SPIRIT SUN. However customers in question did not believe that use of trade mark indicated that jewels to be made came from C. C sued for infringement. Held:
 
·       Is no infringement where D uses trade mark to denote characteristics of goods, and trade mark is not perceived as a sign of origin
Ø  i.e. where use is descriptive

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Intellectual Property Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Intellectual Property Law Notes

Intellectual Property Law Notes >>