Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Holterhoff v Freiesleben

[2002] ECRI-4187

Case summary last updated at 01/02/2020 19:39 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Holterhoff v Freiesleben

C owned trade mark ‘SPIRIT SUN’ for precious stones. D, a jeweller, promised customers he could cut a diamond in the shape of SPIRIT SUN. However customers in question did not believe that use of trade mark indicated that jewels to be made came from C. C sued for infringement. Held:
·       Is no infringement where D uses trade mark to denote characteristics of goods, and trade mark is not perceived as a sign of origin
Ø  i.e. where use is descriptive

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Intellectual Property Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Intellectual Property Law Notes

Intellectual Property Law Notes >>