Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our privacy policy.

Technical settings

Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Gerolsteiner Brunnen GmbH & Co v Putsch GmbH

[2004] EUECJ C-100/02

Case summary last updated at 01/02/2020 20:37 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Gerolsteiner Brunnen GmbH & Co v Putsch GmbH

C had registered mark ‘GERRI’ for mineral water. D sold water bearing the mark ‘KERRY SPRING’. C sued for infringement; D sought to rely on descriptive use defence. Held:
 
·       Use of sign to indicate geographical origin can be defence even if sign is also being used indicate trade origin

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Intellectual Property Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Intellectual Property Law Notes

Intellectual Property Law Notes >>