Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Bromley LBC v GLC

[1983] 1 AC 768

Case summary last updated at 05/01/2020 18:26 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Bromley LBC v GLC

The Transport Act allowed the GLC wide powers and discretion to achieve a good public transport service in London but it ha to do so on ordinary business principles. The GLC sought to reduce traffic congestion by raising rates on London residents to reduce the cost of public transport and thereby incentivise people not to use their cars. HL held this policy to be unlawful because the GLC was not allowed to take into consideration social factors such as traffic congestion in reaching a decision based on ordinary “business principles”- social goods are irrelevant considerations to this end. 
Lord Scarman: If, on ordinary business principles, a venture cannot be run without making a loss, this does not authorise the GLC to go out of its way to make an even bigger loss. NB the section in question required not just that the system be “economic” but also “efficient” and it is likely that as economy dominates, efficiency is lost. Arguably therefore the courts were substituting the balance between the two struck by the GLC with their own decision on the merits. This goes beyond what they are allowed to do under judicial review.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Administrative Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Administrative Law Notes

Administrative Law Notes >>