This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

C-213/89 Factortame (no.1) [1990] ECR 1-2433

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 07/01/2024 03:00

Judgement for the case C-213/89 Factortame (no.1)

Table Of Contents

  • Factortame was a shipping company whose shareholders were mainly Spanish, which made it subject to certain restrictions under the British parliament’s Merchant Shipping Act 1988.

  • Factortame argued that this was contrary to EC law and therefore that the HL ought to order an injunction removing all obstructions to them caused by the Act.

  • The HL refused their appeal on the grounds that they had no power to strike down legislation or make orders contrary to the will of parliament, but that the question of the effect of EC law on English law should be referred to the ECJ.

  • HL referred to ECJ the question of whether interim relief was required as a matter of EC law. ECJ ruled that a national court has a duty to grant interim relief in order to safeguard rights granted under EC law and, where a national law or procedural rule (as here) fails to observe rights granted under EC law, the courts have a duty to apply EC law and disregard the conflicting national law(s).

  • This meant that the HL would have to (and did) grant an injunction preventing the minister from obeying parliament which contradicted the rule against issuing injunctions against the crown. This appears to prioritise effectiveness over national procedural autonomy. 

Lord Bridge

  • Said that on the question of the effect of EC law on UK law and the appropriate remedy, the question was not within the HL’s competence and had to be referred to the ECJ.

ECJ

  • It is for the national courts, under Article 5 EC, to ensure legal protection which people derive from EC provisions with direct effect.

  • However any provision of a national legal system, national legislation or judicial or administrative practice that prevent EC law from becoming fully effective is incompatible with the requirement for effectiveness of EC law.

  • This is as true of a ban on interim relief as any other provision. 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on C-213/89 Factortame (no.1)

Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Constitutional Law Notes
588 total pages
454 purchased

Constitutional Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...