Case C-46 and48/93 Brasserie du Pecheur and Factortame III (no.3) [1996] ECR I-1029
Judgement for the case Case C-46 and48/93 Brasserie du Pecheur and Factortame III (no.3)
Table Of Contents
-
There were two claims for state compensation:
A company was in contravention of an unimplemented EU directive, after the required transposition date, prohibited from importing beer to Germany and sought state compensation.
Factortame wanted state compensation from England.
ECJ
-
Stated:
The requirements of state liability occur regardless of which organ of the state was at fault.
The same requirements as those in Francovich applied, except that “sufficiently serious” is extended to any case involving a breach of EC law.
That compensation was not merely from the date of the judgement forward but for as long as the state had been failing to implement a directive and the claimant had been suffering as a result.
RELATED CASES
For Further Study on Case C-46 and48/93 Brasserie du Pecheur and Factortame III (no.3)
Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Labour Law | Labour Discrimination Notes (64 pages) |
| Labour Law | The Employment Relationship Notes (71 pages) |
| Labour Law | Unfair Dismissal Including Empirical Data Notes (44 pages) |
Constitutional Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.