Case concerned family company; according to articles of company, chairman had a casting vote at directors’ and shareholders’ meetings.
Claimant claimed that in 1967, unanimous agreement between shareholders was made to effect that chairman should no longer have a casting vote.
Unanimous informal agreement was valid to alter company’s articles.
Thus had same effect as special resolution.
Therefore chairman no longer had casting vote.
Is true that it is normally case that special resolution required to alter articles
However no reason why informal consent should not achieve same thing where it is unanimous amongst shareholders
NB as alteration was never sent to Companies House, third parties still entitled to rely on old articles.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Company law | Corporate Governance Notes (18 pages) |