This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Case 114/76 Bela-Mühle [1977] ECR 1211

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:18

Judgement for the case Case 114/76 Bela-Mühle

Table Of Contents

  • To reduce stocks of dried milk powder, those importing livestock feed were required, under regulations, to purchase a quantity of milk powder with every import, set at a high price, and with a high penalty for failure to do so.

  • ECJ held that this was a disproportionate measure and therefore annulled it. 

AG’s opinion

  • There can be no doubt that the Community legal order adopts as its own the fundamental rights which are part of the common heritage of the legal systems of the member-States.

    • The principle that every individual has freedom to choose his trade, occupation or profession is recognised in all the member-States of the Community, albeit in differing terms.

    • It must therefore follow that a similar fundamental principle of freedom exists in Community law also. 

  • Question here is whether it is lawful, in the general interest of the Community, to impose specific burdens and sacrifices upon categories (i.e. livestock importers) outside a sector in difficulty (milk production). 

The principle of proportionality is infringed only if the means chosen are clearly inappropriate and the legislature's grounds are so manifestly erroneous that they can afford no reasonable basis for legislative measures.

  • The principle of non-discrimination is contravened by this policy:

By charging all breeders in their capacity as users of feeding-stuffs and by giving preferential treatment to milk producers. For example, the price of soya meal, which is the most important vegetable protein substance in feeding-stuffs, went up by about 14 per cent after the contested rules entered into force.

  • It is discriminatory to finance one sector of industry that is overproducing with charges on other sectors. 

  • Very weak definition of proportionality- almost closer to that of Wednesbury unreasonableness! Depends what he means by ‘inappropriate’- just ‘rational connection’ or 3rd/4th stages of Wednesbury too…

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Case 114/76 Bela-Mühle

Administrative Law Notes
1,167 total pages
437 purchased

Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...

European Law Notes
1,161 total pages
1032 purchased

European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
European Law Notes
1,161 total pages
1032 purchased

European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...