- Law Cases
- European Law Cases
- European integration, Constitutional limits on European lawmaking Cases
Case C-375/96 Galileo Zaninotto v Ispettorato Centrale [1998] ECR I – 6629
Judgement for the case Case C-375/96 Galileo Zaninotto v Ispettorato Centrale
Table Of Contents
ECJ on proportionality
Given the broad political duties to further the aims of CAP, court takes a hands-off approach:
The legality of a measure adopted in that sphere (agriculture) can be affected only if the measure is manifestly inappropriate having regard to the objective which the competent institution is seeking to pursue.
Here the regulation in question was not ‘manifestly inappropriate’ and therefore was proportionate.
Again, very weak definition of proportionality and close to Wednesbury in fact!
RELATED CASES
For Further Study on Case C-375/96 Galileo Zaninotto v Ispettorato Centrale
Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
European Human Rights law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxfor...
European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.