Defendant was director of family company. Defendant made offer to buy shares of other members of company, and invoked statutory power of compulsory purchase.
Claimant, other shareholders, brought action alleging breach of fiduciary duty owed by Defendant to shareholders, in that Defendant had not disclosed information relevant to true price of shares.
Fact that directors’ duties are owed to company does not stop them coming to owe fiduciary duties to shareholders.
This may happen where:
There is agency relationship
There is special factual relationship giving rise to fiduciary duty
Company was small family company
Shareholders heavily depended on Defendant for information and advice
Transaction was significant
Information relevant to true price of shares had been withheld from shareholders
Thus special facts gave rise to fiduciary duty on part of D to make full disclosure, and Defendant had breached this duty
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Company law | Directors Duties Notes (17 pages) |
Company law | Directors' Duties 1 Cases (5 pages) |
Company law | Directors' Duties 2 Cases (7 pages) |
Company law | Directors’ Duties I Notes (25 pages) |