Queensland Mines Ltd v Hudson [1978] 18 ALR 1
Judgement for the case Queensland Mines Ltd v Hudson
Table Of Contents
Claimant, a company, obtained various mining exploration licences; however company did not have enough money to exploit them, so board consented to Defendant (Claimant’s managing director), taking over exploitation of the licences.
Defendant made a profit, and Claimant sued for breach of fiduciary duty.
Held
Defendant had obtained opportunity by virtue of fiduciary position.
However consent of board meant that there was no breach.
For Further Study on Queensland Mines Ltd v Hudson
Equity notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...
Company law notes fully updated for recent exams in the UK. These notes...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedRelated Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Company law notes fully updated for recent exams in the UK. These notes...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.