Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our privacy policy.

Technical settings

Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Exxon v Exxon Insurance

[1982] 3 All E.R. 241

Case summary last updated at 28/01/2020 16:47 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Exxon v Exxon Insurance

C expended considerable research and effort coming up with name ‘Exxon’ for its corporate group. C sued D, who used word Exxon in their company name. Issue was whether word Exxon was a ‘literary work’. Held:
 
·        A single invented word alone and by itself IS NOT a ‘literary work’
·        For such a word to be literary work, would have to have qualities and characteristics in itself
Ø  Rather than only having a meaning when accompanied by other words
Ø  This unlikely to be possible in practice
·        Fact that research went into its creation irrelevant

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Intellectual Property Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Intellectual Property Law Notes

Intellectual Property Law Notes >>