Claimant, a musicologist, did research into the out of copyright music of a French composer from 1600s, Lalande.
Claimant had found the music, made corrections and additions to pieces to make them playable, amended bass lines and corrected wrong notes.
Defendant, Hyperion, released an album upon which recordings of Lalande’s work based upon Claimant’s scores had been made.
Defendant paid Claimant a fee for providing the scores, but refused to pay royalties on grounds that an editor had not created a ‘musical work’.
Held:
Subsistence of copyright requires an assessment of the whole of work over which copyright is claimed.
‘Musical works’ includes not only the music, but any other elements which contribute towards sound of music when played
Thus the tempos, performing indications could be covered by musical copyright.
Provided they are a product of Claimant’s ‘effort and skill’
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.