Defendant published a song in 1959.
Claimant alleged that this infringed copyright of his song published in 1926. Defendant denied that he had copied Claimant’s work, and accepted that if he had heard it, it was when he was young.
Possibility that Defendant heard work when he was young insufficient to give rise to inference of subconscious copying.
IP law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.