This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Hadley v Kemp [1999] EMLR 589

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:13

Judgement for the case Hadley v Kemp

Table Of Contents

  • Defendant, bass guitarist of Spandau Ballet, held copyright in group’s songs (save for one).

  • Claimant, other members of Spandau Ballet, claimed that all the members of group were joint authors of some or all of the songs.

  • Defendant did not read sheet music, and therefore composed songs on instruments before presenting them to band; Claimant claimed that other members’ interpretations of music with which Defendant presented them was sufficient to make them joint authors or recorded songs.

Held

  • Is clear distinction between the:

    1. Performance of a song;

    2. Authorship of that song

  • On facts, other members were not joint authors of all of the songs

    • Although other members played in their own ways based upon what Defendant had presented them with, these were matters of performance and NOT a creation of a musical work

    • E.g. creation of a sax solo/drum part was simply performers fitting into the rhythm and harmony of song that Defendant had already created.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Hadley v Kemp

Intellectual Property Law Notes
1,014 total pages
1033 purchased

IP law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...

Intellectual Property Law Notes
446 total pages
22 purchased

My notes cover all the main cases in intellectual property law. They a...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Intellectual Property Law Notes
446 total pages
22 purchased

My notes cover all the main cases in intellectual property law. They a...