Claimant was professional fiddle player who had been hired for session recording of song ‘Young at Heart’.
Claimed he had composed violin part which featured prominently in song, and as such was joint author.
Claimant was a joint author.
On facts, violin part is sufficiently significant and original
Violin part is ‘not separate’ from work as a whole.
This because violin part would not make sense without what is in work already
On facts, there was collaboration
To show collaboration must be ‘joint labouring in furtherance of a common design
However this does not mean there must be intention to have joint authorship
Simply requires that the joint authors engaged in a process of jointly creating work in question, rather than Claimant merely making additions to an already complete piece
IP law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Intellectual Property Law | Copyright 2 (Subsistence) Cases (10 pages) |
Intellectual Property Law | Copyright Case Law Notes (55 pages) |
Intellectual Property Law | Copyright Qualifying Person Notes (4 pages) |