This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Beckingham v Hodgens [2003] [2003] ECDR 6 (Ch D)

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:13

Judgement for the case Beckingham v Hodgens [2003]

  • Claimant was professional fiddle player who had been hired for session recording of song ‘Young at Heart’.

  • Claimed he had composed violin part which featured prominently in song, and as such was joint author.

Held

  • Claimant was a joint author.

First Instance 

  1. On facts, violin part is sufficiently significant and original

  2. Violin part is ‘not separate’ from work as a whole.

    • This because violin part would not make sense without what is in work already

Court of Appeal

  1. On facts, there was collaboration

    • To show collaboration must be ‘joint labouring in furtherance of a common design

    • However this does not mean there must be intention to have joint authorship

      • Simply requires that the joint authors engaged in a process of jointly creating work in question, rather than Claimant merely making additions to an already complete piece

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Beckingham v Hodgens [2003]

Intellectual Property Law Notes
1,014 total pages
1035 purchased

IP law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...

Intellectual Property Law Notes
446 total pages
23 purchased

My notes cover all the main cases in intellectual property law. They a...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Intellectual Property Law Notes
446 total pages
23 purchased

My notes cover all the main cases in intellectual property law. They a...