Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Confetti Records v Warner Music UK Ltd

[2003] EWHC (Ch) 1274

Case summary last updated at 29/01/2020 18:59 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Confetti Records v Warner Music UK Ltd

C composed garage track. D had been in negotiations to use track on a compilation album, but deal fell through late in day – by which time D had already mixed album. C’s work was used as backing track over which rappers employed by D rapped lyrics. C claimed derogatory treatment in light of fact that lyrics were suggestive of violence and drug usage, and fact the C’s original work had been distorted beyond recognition. Held:
 
·        Section 80(2) requires that mutilation or distortion of C’s work is only derogatory if prejudicial to honour or reputation of C
Ø  i.e. this inferred from use of ‘or otherwise prejudicial’
·       On facts, no derogatory treatment
Ø  Mere distortion of music does not suffice
Ø  Lyrics in question were not offensive
·       Most importantly, was no evidence that what had happened had caused any prejudice to C’s honour or reputation

Confetti Records v Warner Music UK Ltd crops up in following areas of law