This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Franbar Holdings Ltd v Patel [2008] EWHC 1534 (Ch)

Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 04/01/2024 07:12
  • Relevant test under s. 263(3)(b) is that of a hypothetical director.

    • i.e. if such a person would not attach very much importance to pursuing claim, no leave granted.

  • Factors which hypothetical director would take into account include:

    1. Likelihood of claim being successful

      • i.e. if breaches of duty not obvious, would not bring claim

    2. Ability of company to recover any damages awarded

    3. Costs of proceedings

    4. Damage to company’s reputation

  • Fact that Claimant had alternative claim for unfair prejudice considered important to exercise of discretion under s.263(3)

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
  • 'Oxbridge Notes' prizewinning note marketplace has been serving students since 2010 with premium study materials
  • Reap the benefits of joined-up learning and earn higher grades, just like our 75,000+ happy customers.
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.