This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Fraser v Thames TV [1984] 1 QB 44

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:13

Judgement for the case Fraser v Thames TV

Table Of Contents

  • Claimant had idea for TV series concerning a female rock group. Was partly fictional and partly based on experiences of Claimant. Idea was communicated to Defendant (a scriptwriter), who then communicated it to Defendant 2 (a producer).

  • Defendant and Defendant 2’s TV company went on to produce TV show based on idea, but using different actresses to Claimant.

  • Claimant sued for breach of confidence.

Held

  • Fact that idea was communicated orally is irrelevant to liability

    • I.e. information can be confidential regardless of its form.

  • To be confidential, idea must have some element of originality not already in public knowledge.

  • Must also be case that idea is clearly identifiable

    • I.e. as vague idea does not suffice, but also no need for idea to be fully developed

Facts

  • Information was confidential.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Fraser v Thames TV

Intellectual Property Law Notes
1,014 total pages
1035 purchased

IP law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...

Intellectual Property Law Notes
446 total pages
23 purchased

My notes cover all the main cases in intellectual property law. They a...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Intellectual Property Law Notes
446 total pages
23 purchased

My notes cover all the main cases in intellectual property law. They a...