Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Godfrey v Demon Internet

[1999] 4 All ER 342

Case summary last updated at 17/01/2020 17:23 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Godfrey v Demon Internet

A post was made by a fraud on D’s website that defamed P. P notified D who did nothing. P sued D for defamation. Mr Justice Morland held that whenever D transmitted the article from the storage of their news server, they "publish that posting to any subscriber to their ISP who accesses the newsgroup containing that posting. Thus every time one of D’s customers sees that posting defamatory of the Plaintiff there is a publication to that customer.” Even if D was not a publisher within S.1 Defamation Act, the fact that they had notice of the post and chose not to remove it shows that they knew the statement was defamatory and therefore had no defence under s.1. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Tort Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Tort Law Notes

Tort Law Notes >>