Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Goldsmith v Bhoyrul

[1997] 4 All ER 268

Case summary last updated at 17/01/2020 17:57 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Goldsmith v Bhoyrul

P, a political party, was accused of lying by D, a newspaper, whom it sued. Buckley J denied the claim, because the principle that in a free and democratic society it was contrary to the public interest to permit those who held office in government or were responsible for public administration to sue in defamation applied to a political party putting itself forward for office or to govern. He saw this as analogous to Derbyshire. In reaching his decision, he had borne in mind that “(i) any individual candidate, official or other person connected with the party who was sufficiently identified could sue; (ii) the party can by public announcement answer back; (iii) in this particular case, although the second named plaintiff is a corporation, there is no suggestion that it has any purpose other than to act as a political party.”

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Tort Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Tort Law Notes

Tort Law Notes >>