This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Govt of Zanzibar v British Aerospace (Lancaster House) Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 2333

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:00

Judgement for the case Govt of Zanzibar v British Aerospace (Lancaster House) Ltd

Table Of Contents

  • Plaintiff contracted with Defendant 1 and Defendant 2 for Defendant1 to buy aircrafts from Defendant 2, which Plaintiff would lease and pay rent on from Defendant 1.

  • However there were many faults and Plaintiff sent the aircraft to Defendant 2 for repair. The faults persisted and Plaintiff ceased payments to Defendant 1, who repossessed and resold the aircraft.

  • Plaintiff sued Defendant 2 for rescission or damages.

  • Court held that rescission was not an option (due to exclusion clauses that were reasonable and valid under the Unfair Contracts Act) and, declining to follow Witter, that damages under s.2(2) were only available as an alternative to rescission and could not be awarded where the right of rescission had been lost. 

----

Judge Jack QC seems right in asserting that s.2(2) is an alternative and therefore can only apply to cases where the right to rescission is made out- see wording. 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Govt of Zanzibar v British Aerospace (Lancaster House) Ltd

Contract Law Notes
1,511 total pages
749 purchased

Contract law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Contract Law Notes
1,511 total pages
749 purchased

Contract law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...