Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Greasley v Cooke

[1980] 1 WLR 1306

Case summary last updated at 09/01/2020 15:54 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Greasley v Cooke

Woman contributed to looking after household because of promise that she could live in the house rent-free for life. The court allowed her to do so. It held that although non-financial contribution cannot confer a proprietary interest, it may constitute detriment for the purposes of estoppel. Also, once reliance had been proved, the burden was on the other party to show that she had not acted to her detriment. 
 
Per Lord Denning MR: Financial expenditure is not necessary to invoke proprietary estoppel. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Land Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Land Law Notes

Land Law Notes >>