This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Habberfield v Habberfield [2019] EWCA Civ 890

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:17

Judgement for the case Habberfield v Habberfield

Table Of Contents

KEY POINTS

  • Proprietary estoppel arises when one party makes assurances to another, who then reasonably relies on those assurances and suffers a detriment as a result. In this case, the court recognized the claimants' detrimental reliance and their equitable entitlement to relief.
  • Proprietary estoppel is a flexible remedy that can be tailored to achieve fairness in the circumstances.
  • The relief should reflect the value of the claimants' work and the impact of their expectations on their overall position.

FACTS

  • From 1975, Frank and Jane farmed Woodrow farm in partnership, focusing on dairy farming. Lucy, their daughter, joined the farm full-time after leaving school and played a significant role in the development of the dairy farming business.
  • Over the years, Frank made assurances to Lucy that she would inherit the farming business, subject to certain qualifications. Lucy relied on these assurances, dedicating her time and efforts to the farm, even passing up other opportunities.
  • In 2008, an offer was made for a new partnership, but Lucy rejected it due to concerns about lack of control and interference from her siblings. Tensions within the family escalated, resulting in a fight between Lucy and her sister Sarah in 2013, after which Lucy and her partner Stuart resigned.
  • Following Frank's death in 2014, Lucy initiated a legal claim seeking the transfer of the farm and farming assets based on the assurances made to her and the detriment she suffered as a result of her reliance on those assurances.

COMMENTARY

  • This case highlights the court's willingness to recognize and enforce proprietary estoppel in family farming contexts, ensuring that individuals who have worked on family farms with expectations of future ownership are not left without recourse.
  • The judgement emphasises the court's discretion in crafting relief that achieves a fair outcome based on the particular circumstances of the case, taking into account the claimants' contributions, expectations, and the overall value of the farm.
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Habberfield v Habberfield

GDL Land Law Notes
556 total pages
134 purchased

A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an O...

Land Law Notes
987 total pages
1290 purchased

Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started

Related Product Samples

These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.

Land LawEstoppel Notes (10 pages)
GDL Land LawProprietary Estoppel Notes (8 pages)
GDL Land LawProprietary Estoppel Notes (4 pages)
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Land Law Notes
987 total pages
1290 purchased

Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...