Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Thorner v Major

[2009] 1 WLR 776

Case summary last updated at 09/01/2020 16:11 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Thorner v Major

D implied that he would leave his farm to P in his will. P had worked for free on D’s land for many years for free, and D had entrusted P with money to pay death duties etc. He entered P in his will as implied, but, due to an argument with another relative who stood to inherit a separate asset, tore it up and died intestate. P claimed that he acquired the rights to the farm via proprietary estoppel, and the HL allowed his claim. 
 
Lord Walker: Proprietary estoppel is a means of acquiring rights, but that the agreement had to be ‘sufficiently certain’ (however he did not repeat the claims from Yeoman’s Row v Cobbe that the agreement had to be ‘legally binding’ or ‘binding and irrevocable’). This is still a high threshold, as in Crabb v Arun DC where negotiations were at a very advanced stage. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Land Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Land Law Notes

Land Law Notes >>