Wayling v Jones [1995] 2 FLR 1030
Judgement for the case Wayling v Jones
Table Of Contents
X promised Plaintiff that in return for all the help Plaintiff gave him in running his businesses, Plaintiff would inherit them on X’s death.
This did not happen under X’s will and Plaintiff sued the estate, Defendant, under proprietary estoppel for the business he ought to have received.
CA allowed Plaintiff’s claim, stating that once the plaintiff had shown that the promises were made, and that the plaintiff's conduct was such that inducement could be inferred, the burden of proof shifted to the defendants to establish that the plaintiff did not rely on those promises.
For Further Study on Wayling v Jones
Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedRelated Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Land Law | Estoppel Notes (10 pages) |
Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.