Company’s ordinary shares were divided into 50p shares, and 10p shares.
Articles provided for each share (regardless of value) to get one vote each. Was proposed to sub-divide 50p shares into 10p shares, so that holders of 50p shares would then get 5 votes per share.
Rights of 10p shareholders were not varied
I.e. was no formal change in rights attaching to 10p shares
This even though voting effectiveness of 10p shareholders was significantly diminished
However had the proposal been to simply give 50p shareholders 5 votes per share, this would have been variation
I.e. as 10p shares had a right to voting power paripassu with other ordinary shares
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Company law | Legal Capital Cases (5 pages) |
Company law | Minority Rights And Remedies Cases (9 pages) |
Company law | The Constitution Of The Company Notes (20 pages) |