Director did not disclose his interest in a loan transaction to other directors.
Company entered into loan transaction, and director made a personal profit. Company found out and sued.
Defendant argued that he was not liable for account of profits, as the liability of any director for an account of profits for self-dealing transactions was exempted by one of Articles of company.
Where director dishonestly fails to disclose his interest in a transaction, equitable compensation is available as a remedy.
Liability of directors for loss caused by non-disclosure of an interest in proposed transaction is strict
As soon as director conceals his interest, is breach of duty
However where company would still have entered transaction even if director had disclosed interest, can be no claim for equitable compensation.
I.e. as company has suffered no loss
The self-dealing rule itself cannot be excluded.
Thus Defendant was only exempted from liability if he actually disclosed his interest to the directors.
Is probable that company would have entered transaction nonetheless had they known of Defendant’s interest.
Therefore equitable compensation is not appropriate remedy.
Better remedy is account of profits received by Defendant.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Company law | Directors' Duties 2 Cases (7 pages) |
Company law | Directors' Duties Ii Notes (25 pages) |