Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Hawkes v Cuddy

[2009] 2 BCLC 427

Case summary last updated at 23/01/2020 18:48 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Hawkes v Cuddy

1)     Jurisdiciton of courts under s.994 and IA 1986 s.122(1)(g) are ‘parallel’.
Ø  However is possible to have cases in which there is no unfair prejudice but winding-up is justified
Ø  And vice-versa
2)     If Parliament had intended jurisdictions of two sections to be coterminous, would not have used different language in both sections
3)     Re Guidezoneshould not be followed

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Company law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Company law Notes

Company law Notes >>