Hawkes v Cuddy [2009] 2 BCLC 427
Judgement for the case Hawkes v Cuddy
Table Of Contents
-
Jurisdiciton of courts under s.994 and IA 1986 s.122(1)(g) are ‘parallel’.
However is possible to have cases in which there is no unfair prejudice but winding-up is justified, and vice-versa
If Parliament had intended jurisdictions of two sections to be coterminous, would not have used different language in both sections
Re Guidezone should not be followed
For Further Study on Hawkes v Cuddy
Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
Conflict of Laws notes fully updated for recent exams in the UK. These ...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Conflict of Laws | Birr Jurisdiction And Arts.29 30 Notes (25 pages) |
| Conflict of Laws | Common Law Jurisdiction Notes (18 pages) |
| Administrative Law | Jurisdiction Notes (26 pages) |
Company law notes fully updated for recent exams in the UK. These notes...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.