This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Hawkes v Cuddy [2009] 2 BCLC 427

Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 04/01/2024 07:12
  1. Jurisdiciton of courts under s.994 and IA 1986 s.122(1)(g) are ‘parallel’.

    • However is possible to have cases in which there is no unfair prejudice but winding-up is justified, and vice-versa

  2. If Parliament had intended jurisdictions of two sections to be coterminous, would not have used different language in both sections

  3. Re Guidezone should not be followed

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
  • 'Oxbridge Notes' prizewinning note marketplace has been serving students since 2010 with premium study materials
  • Reap the benefits of joined-up learning and earn higher grades, just like our 75,000+ happy customers.
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.