This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Hellyer Bros v McLeod [1987] ICR 526

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 07/01/2024 18:03

Judgement for the case Hellyer Bros v McLeod

Table Of Contents

  • Plaintiffs were trawlermen based at Hull who for a long time had worked regularly and exclusively for the respondents pursuant to a series of crew agreements, such agreements being signed on each occasion when they were engaged to work on a vessel.

  • When the respondent's vessels were being taken out of commission the trawlermen claimed that they were employees entitled to redundancy.

  • CA held that Plaintiffs were not employees: Despite the long series of short term contracts, there was no ‘global’ or ‘umbrella’ employment agreement that founded ‘mutual obligations’ when Plaintiffs were not working under one of the short term contracts. 

Kerr LJ

A course of dealing can be used as a basis for implying terms into individual contracts which are concluded pursuant thereto, but I can find no authority for the proposition that even a lengthy course of dealing can somehow convert itself into a contractually binding obligation - subject only to reasonable notice - to continue to enter into individual contracts, or to be subject to some 'umbrella' contract.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Hellyer Bros v McLeod

Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...