Henderson v Merrett [1994] 3 All ER 506
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 06:59
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case Henderson v Merrett
Table Of Contents
Plaintiffs entered a syndicate whereby Defendants would manage their funds. Some contracted directly with fund managers, while others had a contract to join the syndicate and their relationship with a fund manager was through the medium of a sub-agency agreement.
HL held that the more “indirect” plaintiff could still claim for tort damages as the relationship was proximate enough.
RELATED CASES
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on Henderson v Merrett
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
1,511 total pages
749 purchased
Contract law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.