Hussain v Lancaster City Council [1999] 4 All ER 125
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:04
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case Hussain v Lancaster City Council
Table Of Contents
Plaintiff ran a shop on a council estate and sued the council, Defendant, for failing to use its powers to stop certain residents from committing acts of criminal harassment against.
-
CA struck out the claim as disclosing no cause of action.
The actions complained of did not involve the tenants’ use of their land, and the council could not be liable unless it had authorised or undertaken the complained of acts itself.
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on Hussain v Lancaster City Council
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
1,070 total pages
850 purchased
Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.