This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Laws v Florinplace [1981] 1 All ER 659

Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 04/01/2024 07:04
  • Defendants opened a sex shop with signs and Plaintiffs (residents of local area) claimed actionable nuisance due to their offence at the shop being present.

  • Court allowed Plaintiff’s claim.

Vinelott J

  • Held that an actionable nuisance extends to cover cases where use of property is such an affront to the reasonable susceptibilities of ordinary people that it constitutes interference with reasonable domestic enjoyment of property.

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
  • 'Oxbridge Notes' prizewinning note marketplace has been serving students since 2010 with premium study materials
  • Reap the benefits of joined-up learning and earn higher grades, just like our 75,000+ happy customers.
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.