This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Laws v Florinplace [1981] 1 All ER 659

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:04

Judgement for the case Laws v Florinplace

Table Of Contents

  • Defendants opened a sex shop with signs and Plaintiffs (residents of local area) claimed actionable nuisance due to their offence at the shop being present.

  • Court allowed Plaintiffโ€™s claim.

Vinelott J

  • Held that an actionable nuisance extends to cover cases where use of property is such an affront to the reasonable susceptibilities of ordinary people that it constitutes interference with reasonable domestic enjoyment of property.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Laws v Florinplace

Tort Law Notes
1,070 total pages
843 purchased

Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions ๐Ÿ™‹ Get answers ๐Ÿ“” It's simple ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ‘„๐Ÿ‘๏ธ

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started

Related Product Samples

These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.

Tort LawNuisance Notes (70 pages)
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Tort Law Notes
1,070 total pages
843 purchased

Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...