Defendants opened a sex shop with signs and Plaintiffs (residents of local area) claimed actionable nuisance due to their offence at the shop being present.
Court allowed Plaintiffโs claim.
Held that an actionable nuisance extends to cover cases where use of property is such an affront to the reasonable susceptibilities of ordinary people that it constitutes interference with reasonable domestic enjoyment of property.
Ask questions ๐ Get answers ๐ It's simple ๐๏ธ๐๐๏ธ
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Tort Law | Nuisance Notes (70 pages) |