Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett

[1936] 2 KB 468

Case summary last updated at 19/01/2020 16:37 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett

P was breeding foxes and put up a sign advertising the fact. D, who was trying to sell the neighbouring space, thought that this would deter buyers. Therefore when P refused to take down his sign, D fired guns along the boundary which, as he knew, causes foxes to avoid mating and kill their young. Court awarded P damages and granted an injunction. MacNaughton J declined to follow Bradford Corporation v Pickles, saying that cases of noise were distinct from cases of percolating water and that in noise cases like this, Christie rules apply so that there was actionable nuisance.

Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett crops up in following areas of law