Defendant, ICE TV, created a electronic schedule of programmes to be broadcast on Australian TV each week.
Claimant alleged that this was an infringement of the copyright subsisting in its weekly TV guide.
Ladbroke v William Hill referred to unfavourably.
Purely informative material reproduced by D is not sufficiently original to have copyright.
Court distinguished between:
Provision of names and title information (which is unoriginal)
Selection of what programmes to put on when, and manner of presentation of that information (which is original)
IP law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Intellectual Property Law | Copyright Notes (34 pages) |
Intellectual Property Law | Copyright 3 (Infringement) Cases (9 pages) |
Intellectual Property Law | Copyright Case Law Notes (55 pages) |