Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe

[2006] UKHL 44

Case summary last updated at 06/02/2020 11:07 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe

 Ps company were defamed in a wider article by D’s newspaper about companies under investigation for links to terrorism. HL said that the newspaper would be acquitted of defamation because (1) the article was on a matter of public importance and (2) “responsible journalism” requirements were fulfilled (e.g. verification of sources etc). These are the 2 essential ingredients that allowed a qualified privilege (i.e. where only malice can overturn the privilege) and can, as here, protect an article from defamation claims. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Constitutional Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Constitutional Law Notes

Constitutional Law Notes >>