Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe

[2006] UKHL 44

Case summary last updated at 06/02/2020 11:07 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe

 Ps company were defamed in a wider article by D’s newspaper about companies under investigation for links to terrorism. HL said that the newspaper would be acquitted of defamation because (1) the article was on a matter of public importance and (2) “responsible journalism” requirements were fulfilled (e.g. verification of sources etc). These are the 2 essential ingredients that allowed a qualified privilege (i.e. where only malice can overturn the privilege) and can, as here, protect an article from defamation claims. 

Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe crops up in following areas of law