R v JF Alford Transport [1997] 2 Cr. App. R. 326
Judgement for the case R v JF Alford Transport
Table Of Contents
Defendants worked for a company and turned a blind eye to their truck drivers working longer hours than was allowed by EC regulations.
In these circumstances CA quashed their convictions as accessories to the offence by saying that passive acceptance did not constitute aiding, abetting etc.
For this there has to be active encouragement or assistance
For Further Study on R v JF Alford Transport
Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
In depth notes with lecturer and textbook comments included as well as ...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedRelated Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Criminal Law | Complicity Short Notes (13 pages) |
| Criminal law | Complicity Notes (23 pages) |
Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.