R v Bainbridge [1959] 3 All ER 200
Judgement for the case R v Bainbridge
Table Of Contents
Defendant bought equipment for X, which X used in a crime.
The judge said that it was sufficient for prosecution to show that D knew of X’s intention to commit a crime of the type which was committed, and that he did something, with that knowledge, to help the commission of the crime.
Defendant was convicted.
CA said this was the correct direction. CA say that mere “suspicion” of the crime is NOT enough.
For Further Study on R v Bainbridge
Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
In depth notes with lecturer and textbook comments included as well as ...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Criminal law | Complicity Notes (23 pages) |
| Criminal Law | Inchoate Offences Notes (23 pages) |
| Criminal Law | Problem Questions Notes (38 pages) |
Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.