Joyce v Sengupta [1993] 1 All ER 897
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:03
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case Joyce v Sengupta
Table Of Contents
Plaintiff was falsely accused by Defendant in an article of stealing from the royal family.
She brought a claim in malicious falsehood (as she couldn’t afford a claim in libel - trials are longer) even though the damages are smaller than in libel.
The CA held that she could bring a claim in malicious falsehood as an alternative to defamation.
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on Joyce v Sengupta
591 total pages
90 purchased
A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an O...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| GDL Tort Law | Defamation 2 Notes (15 pages) |
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
1,070 total pages
849 purchased
Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.