Kingsley v United Kingdom, ECtHR / ECHR Judgment 2000 [2002] 35 EHRR 10
Judgement for the case Kingsley v United Kingdom, ECtHR / ECHR Judgment 2000
Table Of Contents
The Gaming Board had refused Plaintiff’s licence application and he applied for judicial review to the court that the board was biased.
The court agreed but said that the decision couldn’t be overturned since the board was the only tribunal/court with the jurisdiction to make a decision and hence judicial review couldn’t operate (CA said the same thing).
ECtHR said that this breached Plaintiff’s right to a fair trial by an independent and impartial tribunal, and the “full jurisdiction” mentioned as being necessary for the courts in Article 6 ECHR was not present where the courts were unable to quash decisions and remit them to impartial tribunals.
RELATED CASES
For Further Study on Kingsley v United Kingdom, ECtHR / ECHR Judgment 2000
Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
A collection of the best BCL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an O...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.