McGonnell v United Kingdom, ECtHR Judgment of 2000 [2000] 30 EHRR 289
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:00
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case McGonnell v United Kingdom, ECtHR Judgment of 2000
Table Of Contents
Plaintiff claimed that it was a breach of his Article 6 (right to fair trial by independent judge) that the judge who decided his case, the Deputy Bailiff, also had executive and legislative roles as the person who presided over the Guernsey legislature.
This prevented his being “independent” and “impartial” as is required by Article 6.
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on McGonnell v United Kingdom, ECtHR Judgment of 2000
1,167 total pages
437 purchased
Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Administrative Law | Procedural Fairness Rule Against Bias & Right To Fair Hearing Problem Question Notes Notes (34 pages) |
| Administrative Law | Proceedural Fairness Notes (19 pages) |
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
1,167 total pages
437 purchased
Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.