Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Monson v Tussauds

[1894] 1 QB 671

Case summary last updated at 17/01/2020 17:07 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Monson v Tussauds

P’s waxwork effigy was placed in a room with effigies of murderers entitled “chamber of horrors” on account of his being accused of murdering a person. However he had been found not guilty and sued D for defamation. CA said that there was defamation arising from the effigy’s placement and carried a defamatory meaning. 

Lopes LJ: “libels are generally in writing …but this is not necessary; the defamatory matter may be conveyed in some other permanent form. For instance, a statue, caricature, effigy, chalk marks on a wall, signs or pictures may constitute a libel. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Tort Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Tort Law Notes

Tort Law Notes >>