Northside Developments v Registrar General [1990] 170 CLR 146
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:05
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case Northside Developments v Registrar General
Table Of Contents
Three of the Five Judges
Indoor management rule only applies where X can be shown to have had actual or ostensible authority
Thus simply operates to save a transaction where X has entered it with ostensible authority, and where he lacked authority due to some defect of internal procedure.
NB this case was decided in Australia at a time when they did not have an equivalent to s.40.
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on Northside Developments v Registrar General
805 total pages
1073 purchased
Company law notes fully updated for recent exams in the UK. These notes...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Company law | Company Contracts Cases (9 pages) |
| Company law | Transactions With Outsiders Notes (24 pages) |
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
805 total pages
1073 purchased
Company law notes fully updated for recent exams in the UK. These notes...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.