Richards, a director and chairman of defendant company, was accustomed to entering into various contracts on Defendant’s behalf and only informing other directors subsequently. Claimant was managing director of a company with whom Richards had contracted. When Claimant sued Defendant under contract, Defendant alleged Richards had no authority to enter contract in question on behalf of Defendant. Held:
Authority is may be express or implied
Authority is implied where it is inferred from conduct of parties and circumstances of case
e.g. X is managing director - X has implied authority to do anything
e.g. X is sales director - has implied authority to enter contracts of sale
Ostensible authority often coincides with actual authority
E.g. where X is appointed managing director, also has ostensible authority to do anything usually falling under powers of a managing director
Thus here, even if X is expressly restricted from entering contracts of more than £1,000, will have ostensible authority to enter contracts of greater value
Richards had implied authority to enter into contract from circumstances of case
Richards did not have implied authority from nature of office
I.e. is nothing special about position of chairman entitling him to enter any contract without board approval
However did have implied authority from the acquiescence of board in his practice of entering contracts on behalf of company over period of many months
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Company law | Company Contracts Notes (12 pages) |
Company law | Company Contracts Cases (9 pages) |
Company law | Transactions With Outsiders Notes (24 pages) |